From 79b299ee04779af5dd319b81a72680c63ec550e2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: adam Date: Thu, 9 Jan 2025 10:10:18 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] some intro --- script artifacts/script.md | 12 +++++++----- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/script artifacts/script.md b/script artifacts/script.md index 6c0e6c6..9879e75 100644 --- a/script artifacts/script.md +++ b/script artifacts/script.md @@ -1,11 +1,13 @@ -who doesn't love categorizing personalities? let's. +# psychographic profiling + +who doesn't love categorizing personalities? there's horoscopes, there's Meyers-Briggs for business majors, greek letters for where you would be in a wolf pack (obligatory mention that the only person to ever propose that dynamic spent the rest of his life telling everyone he was wrong), there's hogwarts houses, music cliques, there's political allegiances (for those that don't vote). It's fun to sort ourselves and others into tribes. But can it be useful? ## existing psychographic profiles: mtg in MtG, there's 4 player archetypes. -Timmy, bad at the game. -johnny, having fun correctly. -spike, tryhard. -vorthos, huge nerd. +johnny: having fun correctly by exploring the game. +spike: tryhard. +Timmy: child. +vorthos: huge nerd. all of those descriptions are denigrating, let me flesh that out a bit.