# platform as place

[discord message - simulate, from Bat] Why do you hate people on tiktok so much?
*inhale*
[Internet Comment Etiquette, the episode with P.T. Barnum] "when your.. *snicker*" "...? ...oh i get it, he's mentally retarded."

I don't hate the group "people on TikTok". I hate people who contribute to tiktok culture.
We should all make that sort of distinction - we should treat technology platforms as tools people use, rather than peoples' homes.

Do not allow platforms to be places.

## how we do it now

I don't know if people still have a feeling of a Home Forum. 

[note] I doubt they've brought back the eponymous Links, even now.
I won't bore you with mine, but I'll say that even now I feel like it should be "NWS" instead of "NSFW". 
"So what?" you may say. "Cultures emerge, something something diversity etc". 

### slang is [vertically challenged] for [abbreviated] language

I mentioned the acronym NWS before - I would argue that's slang. We might know some tiktok-slang - how about the euphemism "accountant"? or "unalive"? It's a subcategory of slang called algospeak. Saying the word "murder" worries platform owners that you'll offend the delicate sensibilities of shareholders, so tiktok censors the concepts they don't want you to discuss
[some kind of graphic, "things that I imagine are obvious" for the following 2 points]
At the risk of starting an internet argument, censorship is bad, and stopping you from saying something is censorship.

### example as a service

how about an example from software - the most irritating phrasal template, "as a service".

simple version for any of you griddle critters who touch grass: 
[fast]
when you make some software thing for people there is inevitably a stack, like this one.
[image of infra stack]
you would buy these things, and then have them. what a concept.
[as I mention a thing the vendor controls, have some sort of hellish black spike, or maybe eldritch tentacle, wrapping around an item and dragging it back away]
what if you gave money to the vendor, repeatedly forever, and then they still didn't give you the networking, storage, servers, or virtualization? that's Infrastructure As A Service. 
What if you were on this Infinite Payment model, and *also* the vendor didn't let you touch the operating system, any middleware, or the runtime? that's a Platform As A Service. 
What if they owned your data and applications, too? That's Software As A Service.
[exhale, back to normal speed]

### are we happy yet

With both of these, I intend to point out that once a platform owner has its hooks in you, you own less and less. 
[show Fediverse Evangelism, the part where you migrate platforms]
like I've said before, it would be better to switch to where there isn't a platform owner.

but this is worse than that. Twitter users have been complaining about how it's dead, for real this time, for the majority of its existence. A constant cycle of the platform finding new ways to suck, people threatening to leave, and then not leaving. If you're a twitter executive, the message is clear: people will accept whatever you do to them, as long as you're slow enough.
Youtube has the same pattern. Its history is a litany of shifting creators' adsense money over to copyright squatters, while encouraging worse and worse content. 
Twitch, the company built on South Korean Starcraft streamers which pulled out of Korea because it's too expensive, might as well send everyone a handwritten note to say "leave our platform!" no one will. 

[note] and to be fair... there's plenty.
It's the classic problem. On Youtube, people view Rumble as a place filled with undesirable exiles.

Likewise, Twitterati and Twitchists make up reasons for themselves to view the users of their platforms' rivals as their own enemies. 
When you think of yourself not as a creator of streaming video content, but rather as a youtuber, youtube rests on that loyalty. That's way easier than doing anything to implement moderation features like to what twitch has. All they have to do is let you tell yourself there's barbarians at the gates.
If you have the inexplicable addiction to twitter that the world seems to have, you won't dream of being able to post 1024 characters at a time like we've been doing on mastodon this whole time.

## what if we did it right

what if, rather than platform barons trying to take everything they can from you, they spent that effort trying to take from each other? Then we could "federate" them together. but I'll spare you a second episode of fediverse evangelism.

### e-mail

You know what was federated well before the fediverse was built? Email. Servers talk to each other, your email address is you@server. 
[old audio, from myth-of-multifactor] You could run your own email server. Yes, you. Get an old laptop, leave it plugged in, I bet it's got the specs for it. 
amazing. 
[old audio, from myth-of-multifactor] But lots of major email providers have formed a cabal to blacklist quote-unquote spammers. so you can set up a functional mail server, which is already overly complicated, but you'll also have to set up some *more* pieces to be allowed to play with the other kids.
There's a reason that happened. Socially well-adjusted normal people were forced to use email. So to help them understand, they were told it's like writing a letter. 
So the world overall decided that the custom in email-land is to add pointless bullshit before and after *every single message*. 

#### simualted email

[much like how past-o-vision was an old tv, have an old computer on a desk. somewhere give it some kind of funny brand name like Relic386]
[on screen, show an email client. have an email arrive. from administration, to homeburger. see pretentious letterhead.jpg]
[pretentious tone, the kind of guy who thinks this elaborate letterhead looks professional]
Johnathan Doe, M.d., Esq.
Chief Assistant to the Executive Administrative Assistant of Regional Internal Officers

Hello, H. Burger. I hope this missive finds you well. 

[office space] if you could get that TPS report to me, that'd be greeeaaat.

[pen sound, draw the signature]
[re-use audio] Johnathan Doe, M.d., Esq. Chief Assistant to the Executive Administrative Assistant of Regional Internal Officers
TechSolutions technology solutions. bumfuck, iowa.
visit us at clownpenis.fart.
[on the letterhead, have that followed up with] (all the good urls were taken)
call us at 555-777-7777 extension 1497a1.
[fade out toward the end]
connect with us on linkedin, twitter, facebook, pinterest, snapchat, onlyfans, tinder, grindr (during june), wechat, whatsapp, send us an email,

disclaimer: the content of this message is protected by magic legal incantation 21497 subsection 12408. by having an email address that receives this email, you agree to waive your right to a trail by your peers, now and in perpetuity.
[read like one of those faith-healers. who's the ancient televangelist who "blew a divine wind" to end covid?]
begone and a pox upon thy house, Hyperlitigator!

[click reply]
[a hand typing the letter k on a keyboard]
[send email]

[receive email. same letterhead as above, pan through it the same, but speed up both video and audio]
[back to "pretentious" tone from before]
Hello again, H. Burger. Thank you for sending me an electronic mail.
it has come to my attention that you aren't using official company letterhead. This is unprofessional and reflects poorly on our corporate image. Please rectify this immediately.
[pan through the signoff, again faster]

[on screen: "a true story". then change to "a frequent story". then change to "a frequent story about email." then cross out "email" and fill in "communication with soulless business husks"]
[back to normal tone]
That's based on a true story. A common one, surely. Unfortunately, people think of that as a story typical of "email", and treat the technology accordingly. But email is irrelevant. that's a story typical of "communication with soulless business husks". 

[grave stone] Here Lies e-mail. Murdered by its users.
Nevertheless, rest in peace, e-mail. Greatness squandered.

### bluetooth headsets

speaking of technologies associated with cufflink-wearing motherfuckers: bluetooth headsets. If you're constantly talking on a phone, it's more efficient. However, they were indelibly marked with the reputation of making you "look like a douche". And that's a very honest statement; it makes you look like you're on of those people spending 8 megs per message trying to get your email to cosplay as custom stationery. 
And to be fair, getting people to tolerate wearable technology is an uphill battle. How many generations was it before we decided to stop making fun of poeple for wearing glasses?

[grave stone] Here Lies bluetooth headsets. no words.
[yes, put the words "no words" on the gravestone]

### stack overflow

Still with me? we're getting close to the point, i promise.

I've described myself as an Information-Era relic. The advent of the Internet promised sharing information. Arguably it did. But what nerds don't realize is that normal people don't spend their time giving or receiving information. Case in point, StackOverflow. 


Stack Overflow is (or perhaps, was) the last bastion of "practice" on the internet. Forever, idiots would say "just google it" to any question. Having never thought or had questions themselves, they assume google knows everything and will tell you. What they forget is that what google does is search - so most of the time *what* you're searching *for* **doesn't exist**. 99% of the time someone says "just google it", the results are old forum or reddit posts where someone says "just google it".
StackOverflow was building the reference. 
[add some venem to this line]
You know, the point of the internet? the information that we're all now connected to? The google *results*?

But *every. single. time.* someone brings up stack overflow, people come out of the woodwork to tell on themselves.
[alt] i asked those nerds to do my work for me, and they had the gall to tell me my question was already answered. Can you believe the sense of entitlement on those gatekeepers?

[grave stone: "rest in peace, github's rug. You deserved better."]
It has a reputation for gatekeeping, because it's meritocratic. People complain about needing points to act, but the fact that they don't understand why you need points on stackoverlow does not inspire confidence that they understand whatever else they intend to contribute to the record. People who refuse to assimilate but insist the world should bend to them cannot understand this.
It has a reputation for being toxic... with people who expect their authority to be axiomatic. 

[show a stack overflow question, preferably with 0 points and 0 answers. but the question is a picture. a wall, with the "kilroy was here" meme (it's from ww2). instead of the text "kilroy was here", "follow kilroy on tiktok"]
To these, it's not about writing the record. It's about building their self-image, relegating any external effects to at most an afterthought.

StackOverflow is building something. Something to be referenced. That concept is lost on people whose only metric is number of eyeballs watching ads - observe this dogshit take.
[https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/stack-overflow-is-almost-dead/] Since then, things at Stack Overflow went from bad to worse. The volume of questions asked has nearly dried up, new data shows"
A smarter person would understand, less new questions means the project is *achieving* its goal. However...
[https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/stack-overflow-is-almost-dead/] ChatGPT is faster and it’s trained on StackOverflow data, so the quality of answers is similar.
Again, the AI-faithful have no concept of concepts. StackOverflow is *correct*, because it *understands concepts*. But for this so-called engineer, that's irrelevant; the metric is word count.
[https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/stack-overflow-is-almost-dead/] Plus, ChatGPT is polite and answers all questions, in contrast to StackOverflow moderators.
notice 2 more points: one, he does not understand the concept of sharing information. He only measures the practice of asking and answering. two, he imagines a cabal of gatekeepers stifling him, when it's the community at large that rejects him.
[https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/stack-overflow-is-almost-dead/] In January, I asked if LLMs are making Stack Overflow irrelevant. We now have an answer, and sadly, it’s a “yes.”
I don't know why he says "sadly". he doesn't want reference to learn from, he wants a sycophant to save him from learning. 
[https://blog.pragmaticengineer.com/stack-overflow-is-almost-dead/] "I'll certainly miss having a space on the internet to ask questions"... "I'm sure we'll see spaces where developers hang out"
at last we reach the point. 

## the point

[idea channel, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SDPasRas5u0] "here's an idea..." "educational theorist Etienne Wenger wrote about communities of practice which describe roughly-- very roughly-- people who do things together." ... "In this sense, practice is always social practice. Communities forming around said practice share all kinds of stuff."
Rugnetta relaying Wenger present a fascinating (albeit generous) idea. The way people work is to have a practice, then form a social tribe tangentially related to that practice...

But what happens when there is no practice?

StackOverflow is about the development of software. But for imbeciles, development isn't real; it's a space where developers hang out.
Bluetooth headsets aren't viewed as a better solution to voice communication, they're a fashion accessory that signifies lifestyle.
e-mail isn't thought of as "a way to send text between machines", it's treated as "an official communication channel where your boss yells at you".
the fediverse allows you to free yourself and your social circle from the platform they happen to use - so it's incomprehensible to fame-seekers.

[reuse graphic from "as a service" section]
so those who own the technology you use are being given leverage over you for free.

TikTok has the reputation of being "the place where memes happen". That was derived from its previous reputation as being "a place where everyone can go viral." But.
the comparative ease of going viral was because of manual intervention by bytedance. They *crafted* exactly the community they wanted. 
[https://www.forbes.com/sites/emilybaker-white/2023/01/20/tiktoks-secret-heating-button-can-make-anyone-go-viral/]
And it was easy - they manually add "heat" to videos. 
So of course people took to tiktok. rather than some decrepit talk-show skeletons disguising their financial investment in the abysmal status quo as frosty-cold political takes, TikTok entices you by putting good-looking women up front... all you have to do is mute whatever terrible music they're dancing to. 
[note] also it's portrait mode only. <br />fun story, having that complaint caused my sister to disown me a 2nd time.
Its technology is actively trash. it's built on unapologetically, actively manipulating what you see. And its owned by a company with a history of doing so.

whenever someone self-censors with algospeak, they have given away their voice to their corporate overlord. If you indulge that sort of person, you give your attention to their corporate overlord, who in turn decides what they will allow you to say.
[note] even when it's not the government doing it
I know, arguing "Censorship is Bad, Actually" is an uphill battle, for some reason. so let me leave you with some quick examples.

### hypothetical - atomic wallet 

I know lots of people just add "reddit" to every google search they run to hopefully get actual people talking to each other - but I think people forget, reddit has a proud history of fun and/or useful bots. 
[that photo of atomic wallet]
The value of getting conversation from reddit is that when someone says something stupid, someone else can tell them they're stupid. 
Is atomic wallet open source? some braindead marketron says:
[alt] yes :) it *uses* open source *components*!
and then a person can have a comment right under them saying "that's not what words mean." 

### youtube context cards

Contrast this with Youtube trying to algorithmically "add context". I *can* think of a case where this is agonizingly close to being useful: 
[assemble pie chart. title; Kyle Hill's Haircare tips. 25%: go to a salon, 25% argon oil, 75% toxic masculinity bad]
people are constantly asking kyle hill about his hair, and he generally has 2 useful points - 1 is "go to the place where hair experts are" and a second one is "use argan oil". so what's argan oil?
[https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wiENqMom1TM]
here's someone who calls herself *Dr* Dray. Youtube adds context - Yes, Dr Dray is a doctor, licensed in the US... but that's it. 
[note] For what it's worth, to my untrained eye.. she <i>is</i> a doctor of dermatology. And also argan oil appears to <i>not</i> be <i>detrimental</i>, but there doesn't look like much conclusive information on benefits.

How much nutritional quakery is perpetrated by doctor phil, who *is* a doctor... of psychology. Not to mention chiropractors! if that little information bar showed me *what* Dr Dray is a doctor *of*, that would be a very useful link. But that's hard, just trust youtube, rriiiiight? 
The system isn't great at this. here's Erik doing a whole video on Haarp. the "context" google adds is for climate change. close, but they *have* a card for haarp. leading to an amusing screenshot of a haarp video mocking another haarp video *that has the haarp card*.. tagged with a different card.

Keep the cards in mind. YouTube *also* prevents videos from being posted. There's a great metal remix of kenneth copeland blowing a divine wind - i reposted that, and my account will carry a strike with it forever for "medical misinformation". despite no information, wrong or otherwise, being in the video.

[on screen list: demonstrate condemnation, get credit for openness, project weakness, censor]
and *that* is why youtubers engage in "voldemorting" the pandemic. The context cards are a way for them to demonstrate condemnation of a message, give themselves credit for not censoring, let viewers believe it's easy to circumvent any censorship efforts, while censoring.

### only influencers get customer service

To post any review on amazon, it has to be approved... by amazon. whenever you post a review on the google play store, it reserves the last word for the app's owner (which is usually a form letter and a link to their FAQ, lol). 
Remember when Bethesda advertised a canvas bag and delivered a nylon bag? 1st move, they sent an email that effectively said "caveat emptor, bitch.". 2nd move, they blamed material supply.
[internet historian, The Fall of 76, roughly 16 minutes ish] it turns out, they did make the canvas bag. they gave them all out... to influencers. [...] it's not the same one. But it's made of that ever-scarce material: canvas.

how many times have we seen a company get called out by an influencer for some reason or another, then they immediately move to fix it... as a 1-off, for that influencer. Mere mortals like you and I?
[https://arstechnica.com/health/2023/11/ai-with-90-error-rate-forces-elderly-out-of-rehab-nursing-homes-suit-claims/, maybe more about nH Predict]
we get an algorithm. built in to the platform, serving only economic incentives.
[quote from grapes of wrath. chapter 5? about the bank. "it's not me, it's the monster"]
“Sure, cried the tenant men,but it’s our land…We were born on it, and we got killed on it, died on it. Even if it’s no good, it’s still ours….That’s what makes ownership, not a paper with numbers on it."

"We’re sorry. It’s not us. It’s the monster. The bank isn’t like a man."

"Yes, but the bank is only made of men."

"No, you’re wrong there—quite wrong there. The bank is something else than men. It happens that every man in a bank hates what the bank does, and yet the bank does it. The bank is something more than men, I tell you. It’s the monster. Men made it, but they can’t control it.” 
