script stuff regenerated by a tool
All checks were successful
beefhavers/logic-minus-facts/pipeline/head This commit looks good

This commit is contained in:
adam 2025-11-29 17:38:21 -05:00
parent 8cb2fe112f
commit f3b537d774
4 changed files with 18 additions and 4 deletions

Binary file not shown.

Binary file not shown.

View File

@ -1,8 +1,19 @@
what the fuck was that? Um, can you be very clear about your definition of worship again?
are you a christian? let's say, for the sake of argumentation, i am attend to, prioritize, and sacrifice for.
Okay. Do Catholics attend to Mary?
Well, yes.
Okay. So, do they fit that description of worship?
Yes.
So, you would say Catholics [...] worship Mary.
Well, they might not put her in the highest, but you would put it that way.
No, you just said it. Now you're taking it back.
Let's Let's go over your definition of worship again. What's your definition of worship?
How do they regard How do they regard Mary? Why are you asking me that? Because you're a Christian. You say that. I haven't claimed that. Oh, what is this? Is this Christians versus atheist? I don't know.
prioritizing mutual resolution over winning arguments
"i'm bursting at the seams, here!" "i'm bursting at the seams, here!"
"cuno doesn't fuckin' care!" "cuno doesn't fuckin' care!"
Give the child his speed, woolie! Give the child his speed, woolie!
He's almost exquisitely ugly. Like a gremlin. He's almost exquisitely ugly. Like a gremlin.
Measurehead. Measurehead.
YOUR BODY BETRAYS YOUR DEGENERACY. YOUR BODY BETRAYS YOUR DEGENERACY.
The implication of that skill reflects measurehead's essence in a grotesque irony. Being logical does not make one right.

View File

@ -20,7 +20,11 @@ Fortunately, I've been able to ask others. A therapist once told me she thought
i've only recently heard jordan peterson argue. i've only recently heard jordan peterson argue.
irritating sophistry. A style of so-called debate for those who aren't seeking to build consensus, just arguing as a verbal dominance struggle. irritating sophistry. A style of so-called debate for those who aren't seeking to build consensus, just arguing as a verbal dominance struggle.
maybe someone should tell Doctor Peterson that that's the exact opposite of the point of arguing.
My sister argues the same way. My sister argues the same way.
She has one principal, one value: power for her. So when she thinks she's constructed an argument that will put her on top, her one question is the only question to be answered, no matter how absurd. there was a time she recommended me to one of her business partners. when I asked for literally any information at all about this guy, she lectured me on how it's disrespectful to question her. Conversely, if I ask her any question in the slightest, she refuses to answer. I swear i could ask her what color the sky is and she'd produce a thousand words of verbal diahrrea, ending with her getting on her soap box and proclaiming some cause at me, but at no point would the word "blue" come up. She has one principal, one value: power for her. So when she thinks she's constructed an argument that will put her on top, her one question is the only question to be answered, no matter how absurd. there was a time she recommended me to one of her business partners. when I asked for literally any information at all about this guy, she lectured me on how it's disrespectful to question her. Conversely, if I ask her any question in the slightest, she refuses to answer. I swear i could ask her what color the sky is and she'd produce a thousand words of verbal diahrrea, ending with her getting on her soap box and proclaiming some cause at me, but at no point would the word "blue" come up.
It's maddening. In every literal sense. It's maddening. In every literal sense.
@ -68,10 +72,9 @@ All the skill exemplars represent being in too deep. Cuno's half light is easily
the game says that too much logic will cause you to lose yourself in an ivory tower, wrapped up in some chain of reasoning that completely ignores what's in front of you. the game says that too much logic will cause you to lose yourself in an ivory tower, wrapped up in some chain of reasoning that completely ignores what's in front of you.
The logical thing to do is fit more information into your theory of the world. Even if it comes from an unexpected place. The logical thing to do is fit more information into your theory of the world. Even if it comes from an unexpected place.
Maybe with a sufficiently galaxy brained intellect, sufficient logic could solve everything, including morality. Realistically, you'll need some "facts &", as well. Maybe with a sufficiently galaxy brained intellect, sufficient logic could solve everything, including morality.
whatever it takes. Just remember to open your eyes every so often, or you might turn into a color theorist. whatever it takes. Just remember to open your eyes every so often, or you might turn into a color theorist.