rendered, uploaded. still need to do subs.

src/script-primaryVO.txt

@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ so I guess, keep the faith? the one deer walking down this one path will *toooot
 Keep waiting. Your patience will be rewarded. Your efforts will pay off. Have faith.
 
 Ok, for real. Deer exist, I know. I know because I have evidence. 
-Respectively; no, no, and not entirely but maybe a tiny bit? You can only *approach* 0 faith, like an asymptote. Acknowledging that gives you a heuristic to weigh the validity of evidence. If it just offloads faith elsewhere, it's useless. If it requires faith itself, it's even worse than that. People talking about something's existence is not evidence. but I can buy some laughably overpriced venison in the store, right now. Although, that could be false advertising. This would be the same place selling some corn syrup in some sake labeled mirin. Not just mirin, but they specifically label their aji mirin as "hon" mirin. They sell wasabi as well, which I'm sure is horseradish with green food coloring. the fact that someone would lie to everyone and argue it's ok because it makes money is... really... how the world works. caveat emptor, bitch.
+Respectively; no, no, and not entirely but maybe a tiny bit? You can only *approach* 0 faith, like an asymptote. Acknowledging that gives you a heuristic to weigh the validity of evidence. If it just offloads faith elsewhere, it's useless. If it requires faith itself, it's even worse than that. People talking about something's existence is not evidence. but I can buy some laughably overpriced venison in the store, right now. the fact that someone would lie to everyone and argue it's ok because it makes money is... really... how the world works. caveat emptor, bitch.
 All because one salesman proposes one thing via marketing material, and doesn't get interrogated.
 
 

src/script.md

@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ Keep waiting. Your patience will be rewarded. Your efforts will pay off. Have fa
 
 Ok, for real. Deer exist, I know. I know because I have evidence. 
 [alternate] BOLD statement. Have you disproved Godel, and developed a framework for determining truth that requires no axioms? have you out-logic'd renee descartes and proven anything at all, when you could be a brain in a jar? have you done what CGP grey is afraid to, and ventured through the "What Is True" dimension, returning unscathed?
-Respectively; no, no, and not entirely but maybe a tiny bit? You can only *approach* 0 faith, like an asymptote. Acknowledging that gives you a heuristic to weigh the validity of evidence. If it just offloads faith elsewhere, it's useless. If it requires faith itself, it's even worse than that. People talking about something's existence is not evidence. but I can buy some laughably overpriced venison in the store, right now. Although, that could be false advertising. This would be the same place selling some corn syrup in some sake labeled mirin. Not just mirin, but they specifically label their aji mirin as "hon" mirin. They sell wasabi as well, which I'm sure is horseradish with green food coloring. the fact that someone would lie to everyone and argue it's ok because it makes money is... really... how the world works. caveat emptor, bitch.
+Respectively; no, no, and not entirely but maybe a tiny bit? You can only *approach* 0 faith, like an asymptote. Acknowledging that gives you a heuristic to weigh the validity of evidence. If it just offloads faith elsewhere, it's useless. If it requires faith itself, it's even worse than that. People talking about something's existence is not evidence. but I can buy some laughably overpriced venison in the store, right now. the fact that someone would lie to everyone and argue it's ok because it makes money is... really... how the world works. caveat emptor, bitch.
 All because one salesman proposes one thing via marketing material, and doesn't get interrogated.
 
 ## hyperlitigator